Re: Opera is faster, but...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sam Leon yazmış:
>
>
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> tejas wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Firefox in Windows is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox in Debian and
>>> Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
>>> Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
>>> Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
>>> Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
>>> Windows is fastest!
>>>
>>> *Why?* Please clarify!
>>>
>>
>> I doubt that the reasons can be given unless they are very obvious.
>> This whole question of "faster" depends so much on feelings and
>> specific applications/sites.
>>
>> I know opera in Debian is faster on my two-seater than iceweasel. But
>> that is when it reads my wordpress blog. But in most other sites the
>> advertisements get in the way and then it is slower again.
>>
>> Hugo
It's not about page's render time. Menus, scrolling, start up, and even
closing. Evertythin is slow.
>
> I think it is a common complaint that FF in linux starts up slower than
> in windows. Took me awhile to get used to it.
> Sam
>>
Believe me, it's not only startup. It eats a lot of cpu while using it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBRpTtNXCg+7fCe3L1AQLnNwf+IDKydynBPk+TGkIu7yWXVBYEn+4LzfXx
q6InRyrLD4+TbsfEJ/g8XLyE/YQa8WmXhvqxPzaGbPwVUyLbtKrXIWM8+TtiZl3i
rW+wfrHMzV/iDOJhWdg89E/HaYyCwGHeEkGb5aa89PEHKxsa3z0rDxrhmrvGsEc0
81wnd5p46C0ZCQuQoCJ5Dcmq2LULgHQB3uh7+VsmrmPZq5wUOXTeF0oHfZFCVD9I
FRv4JhdxYhPLx8cJicvDrZnzGIyTj7VGWpU4vkHefJzp1BkUKaV1wyHLw7hXRrx0
BjnxqEicBQHEwns/a3DV139BdXBZPh1MvQJRJZ43K/S87Vm7ybiDQg==
=/foO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: