Re: a dumb query? pls humor me

[mc3393 <luigi.bianca@gmail.com>]

Steve Lamb ha scritto:

>Paul Johnson wrote:
>  
>
>>I think it speaks volumes about how indefensible your position is that you
>>resort to ad hominems.
>>    
>>
>
>    You know, I never understood this rational.  It seems to me that it
>provides a simple way for the idiotic and crazy to "win" an argument.  They
>can keep spewing their inanities, ignoring the facts (as Arnt has here if
>you've read the thread) and when the rational person gets tired of dealing
>with someone who is clearly not playing the same game much less with a full
>deck and rightly says so, they've "lost".
>
>    Sometimes calling a kook a kook and an idiot and idiot is the only
>statement you've got.  If it's accurate it's not ad hominem.
>
>  
>
so if Arnt had reason (as he has)

the only
statement we've got.

would be calling you an idiot kook.
Ac-cu-ra-te-ly sai-d i-di-ot koo-oo-k
Luigi
P.s. obviously nothing personal ...