OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:59:36 -0500 (EST), judd@wadsworth.org wrote in
message <[🔎] tkrat.da20603e08d80f47@wadsworth.org>:
> On 7 Mar, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:41:39AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Accepting Hussein's offer to leave the country with his two sons
> (delivered through back channels to Richard Perle in late 2002).
..this would have been the cheapest way, and would still have allowed
arrests and trial etc of Saddam and crew "on technicalities" after
securing the country.
> And let's not forget that the Bush administration was cherry
> picking data, distorting, and outright lying to portray Iraq as a
> threat to the US.
>
> > This is why there is all this revisionism going on in the media and
> > on the left. They hate feeling like they got played.
..sure they're just not trying to evade the War Crimes Act? ;o)
> > Saddam played the whole world. He got what he deserved.
..no, no and no, he was denied a lawful trial under Article 90 of
Protocol Additional I of the 4 Geneva Conventions, he was denied
a lawful death sentence and he did in no way deserve the martyr
status Sissy Boy George gave him by murdering him instead of
going by the book and hang him in full compliance to Law.
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Roberto
> >
>
> And to be fair, let's not forget that the right does plenty of
> revision, also.
..even here in D-U.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: