Re: flashplugin-nonfree: Flash Player 9 beta
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 22:09 -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
> >Marc Shapiro:
> >
> >
> >>Marc Shapiro wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>But, once it does get into Sid, or whatever testing will be, then it
> >>>is almost certain to get backported so that those of us that prefer a
> >>>'stable' machine can get to all the sites that want 'the most current
> >>>version of Flash' which seems to include sites like nickjr.com and
> >>>noggin.com. Both of these worked until recently, but now I am having
> >>>problems with them, and my daughter (almost 6 years old) really likes
> >>>the games.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Ooops! I missed that you were suggesting that Etch would not make the
> >>December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I did refer to FP9, I only mentioned FP8 because I have never seen a
> >site telling my I need FP9, but there are a couple that reject browsers
> >with at least FP8.
> >
> >But what I actually wanted to say: FP is closed-source. I do not think
> >that there is a way to backport it.
> >
> >
> Right! My brain slipped. But if the installer is there for Flash
> Player 9, then where is the actual binary. I just looked on the adobe
> site, again, and when I go to download Flash Player all it offers me is
> 7.0.68.0, which is the same version that I have had installed for what
> seems like forever.
Been gone for a while... but I am back.
To answer your question Marc:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html
Reply to: