Re: GNU Hurd

To: debian <debian@benburb.demon.co.uk>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GNU Hurd
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:16:35 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060203161634.GP9449@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian <debian@benburb.demon.co.uk>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060203163920.GA6646@benburb.demon.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 142682e10602030601q4cdc922p7a28f326644f604@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] affbfedc0602030625o6f45c923y@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20060203163920.GA6646@benburb.demon.co.uk>

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:39:20PM +0000, debian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:25:45PM +0000, John Halton wrote:
> > GNU/Hurd. There is a lot of work to do before we can make a release."
> 
> But, what are its advantages of it over the Debian we know now and
> love so well ?

Debian GNU/Hurd isn't much different to Debian GNU/Linux, except not as
stable and mature overall.  As for the GNU Hurd, see here:

http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd-paper.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/faq.en.html


cheers,

Michael

-- 
"We're way ahead of you here.  The Hurd has always been on the cutting
edge of not being good for anything."
        -- Roland McGrath

Reply to:

References:
- GNU Hurd
  - From: Joseph Smidt <jsmidt@byu.edu>
- Re: GNU Hurd
  - From: John Halton <johnhalton@gmail.com>
- Re: GNU Hurd
  - From: debian <debian@benburb.demon.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Backing up Windows using rsync
Next by Date: Re: Missing public keys in aptitude
Previous by thread: Re: GNU Hurd
Next by thread: Re: GNU Hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread