[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: khubd timed out - Solved



On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:47:23 -0500
"Thomas H. George" <tom@tomgeorge.info> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:55:42AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I have two boxes - both Sarge but with a 2.6.11 kernel built from 
> > kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz which I downloaded from testing 
> > last summer.  One box accepts usb devices (usb storage, Wacom tablet) 
> > with no problem the other does not reporting a series of "khubd timed 
> > out ..." messages.  The kernels for the two boxes are identical as I 
> > copied the kernel source and .config files from the box which accepts 
> > the usb devices to the other box, unzipped and un-tarred the source 
> > files and compiled a new kernel with the copied .config file.  The two 
> > boxes do not have an identical set of Sarge programs as they are used 
> > for different purposes but dmesg, syslog and kern.log give me no clue 
> > why the second box will not accept the usb devices other than the khubd 
> > timed out messages.
> > 
> > Does anyone have suggestions where I should look for the root of this 
> > problem?
> > 
> > Tom George
> > 
> APIC was the culprit.  When I turned this option off in Processor
> Features and recompiled the kernel all the usb devices load and unload
> correctly.  I am not sure how it was that the other box was not using
> APIC as it was selected in the .config I copied but to be sure I have
> turned it off in both .config files.
> 
> Tom
>  > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

You can also turn it off with boot option 'noapic'

Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)



Reply to: