Re: Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine install SMP kernel?
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Clive Menzies wrote:
>> On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > > Dick Davies wrote:
>> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top
>> doesn't
>> > > > see them for some reason).
>> > >
>> > > Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
>> > > processor machine? I have and top is quite useless there with
>> > > all of the screen being taken up by the cpu listing there is no
>> space
>> > > left for "top" processes.
>> >
>> > Press "1" and top will show the CPUs individually.
>>
>> This list is brilliant :)
>>
>> Little tips like this make a real difference.
>
> Believe it or not, I found that by accident. A quick trip to the top
> manual
> told me far more than what I'd ever know about how to make a contrieved
> user interface, and did not explain what I wanted to know (WTF are those
> "hi"
> and "si" CPU statistics).
May I redeem myself by pointing out they are h/w and s/w interrupts, resp
Reply to: