Re: Responses to the list
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:46:48 -0700
Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > If you say so. It works well enough for my limited needs.
>
> Clients that treat IMAP like a glorified POP should
> just remove it and save the compile time. Seriously.
When I've examined the ~/.evolution IMAP cache, I see
headers, not mail bodies.
> >> Harfs on IMAPS
>
> > For those of use who don't use IMAPS, though...
>
> Ah, yes, passwords in the clear.
Private LAN.
> >> All of those are far more serious than no
> >> reply-to-list.
>
> > Any recommendation, besides mutt?
>
> Sure, Thunderbird. Between lousy IMAP, broken IMAPS,
> bad wrapping, the lousy "personalities" model and no
> reply-to-list the first 4 are pure frustration while the
> last is a minor annoyance. The frustration is trying to
> figure out why the firefox gang has let such a trivial
> thing last so long while programming in far more complex
> features with a far smaller appeal. :(
I guess I've just gotten used to Evo. As soon as libsoup2.2
gets fixed, I'm going to install it on my new system.
Reply to: