Re: intrusion via ssh
On Friday 01 April 2005 22:05, John Hasler wrote:
>Gene Heskett writes:
>> With all due respect John, they really should be pressing charges
>> against the perp who owned the box in the first place AND their
>> network admin who probably wasn't keeping the systems fully
>> patched.
>
>"Should" is not a player here. Besides, they can do all that _and_
>prosecute you. You "should" have a claim against them for allowing
> their machine to be used to attack yours, but you'll get nowhere
> with it.
And there is definitely something wrong with that picture John, after
all, we are also victims of their negligent actions.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
Reply to: