Re: Kerberos should be in the base system
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2005 13:35, Andreas Ehn wrote:
> > I second this. Unfortunately, it seems that part of Debian is going in
> > the opposite direction, having recently unkerberized the Evolution MUA
> > packages in response to this bug report:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285908
>
> That's a shame, especially since the "correct" response would've been to
> remove the Kerberos 4 dependency while leaving the Kerberos 5 linkage
> intact.
And it probably means that a wishlist bug with a *proper* patch, with all
builddeps and conflicts needed would be accepted. Anyone who actually uses
kerberos would care to try?
BTW if anyone uses zephyr out there, I need some help with the Zephyr
support in Cyrus-imapd.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: