Re: 100Mbit Lan runs at sloow 417Kbs!!
oh sorry. i tryed tranfering over samba and SCP same slow speed. on
the windows machine i used normal windows networking SMB protocol.
The transfer is between to local machines one windows the other debian.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Zachary Rizer
<zrizer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- Adamo <im2sexy4you@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi i had windows on this box before and the speed
> > was above 3000Kbs i
> > installed debian and now its a slow 417kbs.
> > im running sarge with kernel 2.6.8 on a 800Mhz
> > 512ram machine and
> > minimal amount of services, there is plenty of cpu
> > left so thats not
> > the problem.
> > its a asus av7 motherboard and the netcard is a
> > Realtek Semiconductor
> > Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) card.
> > my switch is 100Mbits.
> > Ok got any ideas?
> > Im desperate!
> > heres som output
> >
> > Output fra mii-tool:
> > eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
> > product info: vendor 00:00:00, model 0 rev 0
> > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
> > capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
> > 10baseT-HD
> > advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
> > 10baseT-HD
> > link partner: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
> > 10baseT-HD flow-control
> >
> > output from ifconfig:
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
> > 00:C0:26:78:14:A1
> > inet addr:192.168.0.100
> > Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
> > Metric:1
> > RX packets:599881 errors:0 dropped:0
> > overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:795532 errors:0 dropped:0
> > overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:173192384 (165.1 MiB) TX
> > bytes:842761893 (803.7 MiB)
> > Interrupt:3 Base address:0x7000
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> > debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
>
> It runs slow when? When transferring files between
> two local machines? Using what protocol, ftp, http,
> smb, nfs, other? How are you measuring the
> throughput? How did you measure it when you ran
> windows? There are far more variables at play here
> than you may think.
>
> ~Zaq
>
Reply to: