Re: keeping woody
Incoming from Joost Witteveen:
> Clive Menzies wrote:
>
> >># this doesn't:
> >>deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security woody/updates main contrib
> >>non-free
> >
> >Ah! Well this does here:
> >deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main
>
> [snip]
> Anyway http://www.debian.org/security advertises
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free
Nope.
(0) root /root_ aptitude update
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/contrib Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/non-free Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/contrib Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org woody/updates/non-free Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_woody_updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to update the package lists to correct these missing files
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
- -
Reply to: