Re: Does Unstable become Testing?
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:28:22AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
>> No. Unstable (sid) will always be unstable. Testing
>> becomes the new stable, and then a new testing is born
>> (etch?).
>
> Could you be more precise?
> What is renamed, what is forked, what is cloned?
Start of the cycle:
Unstable forks a new testing.
Testing freezes, frozen replaces testing.
Frozen then replaces existing stable, which moves to the obsolete archive.
> I presume that "stable" simply becomes symlinked to "sarge" instead of
> "woody."
Or, sarge re-symlinked to stable, IIRC...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBVMcJUzgNqloQMwcRAnBdAJ4ha+haRkrw775Pe6/SFl59qf/jDQCgyyEt
qIYFILMWLfL/GLC94F/qR5w=
=Jf9G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: