On Monday September 13 at 10:37pm Patrick Wiseman <pwiseman@gmail.com> wrote: Mail-Followup-To: is better than Reply-To: for mailing lists, see http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html > Cheap shot. I'm not pushing gmail, but the people who are offering > gmail invites do not remotely fall within that policy. Its unsolicited bulk (if you count how many people subscribe to this list) email. Counts as SPAM in my book. Just because they are not advertising their own products/services, its still not right. > (I'm bottom-posting only because this list - uniquely, in my > experience - insists on it. You really should try reading your email > in reverse chronological order. It works.) Every other list I'm on (or have been on) expects it: -any debian list -dillo -giFT -grip -linux-kernel -linux-usb-(devel,users) -naim -qmail -scponly -sylpheed-claws and quite a few newsgroups I used to watch. -- -johann koenig Now Playing: At the Driv-in - Catacomb : Plea For Peace - Take Action (Vol. 1) Today is Sweetmorn, the 37th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3170 My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/
Attachment:
pgpiUq5_otkQp.pgp
Description: PGP signature