On Wed, Sep 08 2004 at 02:42:24PM +0200, Raphaël Berbain wrote: > It's an mml (MIME Meta Language) tag. Paul uses Gnus, which in turn > uses Emacs' Message mode to compose messages. mml is a tagging > language mecanism used by Emacs' message mode to convey > meta-information internally to the MUA, mainly to compose mime > messages. AFAICT, it shouldn't actually appear in the resulting > message, instead it should be rewritten as some MIME stanzas - or, in > this case, as an inline PGP sig I guess. Thanks for the info. All I know is once I tried gnus and it told me "No gnus is good gnus." and I went back to mutt. :) > Paul: You might want to investigate that. There are two issues that > I can see: First, this mml tag shouldn't end up in the final message, > should it ? Second, ISTR that PGP/MIME is recommended over inline > PGP. The reason is that mail systems can handle reliably & > automatically PGP/MIME signatures (handling being verify, strip, > whatever). OTOH, they cannot with inline PGP. Yay pgp/mime, but it still seems to befuddle some poorly designed but widely used MUA's. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t@tomass.dyndns.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature