Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:29:23 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87n03lcze4.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200406021626.09836.robsims@robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com> (Rob Sims's message of "Wed, 2 Jun 2004 16:26:09 -0600")
References: <E1BTMKV-0004lg-00@optimus.eros.lan> <[🔎] slrncbrs94.phv.spam@home.bounceswoosh.org> <[🔎] 87ekoxeusz.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 200406021626.09836.robsims@robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com>

Rob writes:
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/05/27/tech.spam.reut

No cracked machines involved.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

References:
- Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
  - From: "Monique Y. Mudama" <spam@bounceswoosh.org>
- Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
  - From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
  - From: Rob Sims <robsims@robsims.ipf.fc.hp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: automatic login (NOT gdm)
Next by Date: Re: network options
Previous by thread: Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: TMDA and other challenge-response systems considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread