[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BroadCom net card (bcm4400 kernel module) and sarge installer



I tried running the install in expert mode - I thought this might allow me to specify "additional driver modules". It didn't quite:
 - it detected the NIC happily,
 - prior to the DHCP said it needed the b44 module loaded, good,
- then DHCP failed and when I tried to redetect the hardware b44 was no longer in the list.

I have a wireless onboard NIC on this machine too (it's an Intel Centrino-based laptop) - could this be causing problems? How does a user ensure the appropriate NIC is used for install?

Thanks,
Rua HM.

Rua Haszard Morris wrote:
From: Adam Aube <aaube01@baker.edu>
Rua Haszard Morris wrote:

 > >> I have a BroadCom 4400 NIC that is not being detected, leading to
 > >> DHCP failing, leading to no additional .debs being available...
 > > tg3 module contains support for BroadCom net cards

Cheers - I am guessing that now I simply need to "load additional driver
modules" and select tg3 early in the installation.. correct?


Yes - assuming the Sarge installer doesn't find it for you.

Aha - I just tried doing that - there doesn't seem to be an option "load additional driver modules" (or anything like it) in the sarge installer. Should there be?

I couldn't get to the list of modules that I'm used to seeing in the qoody installer; it tries to autodetect first. When I manually chose it "Detect hardware" again, after the DHCP failed, i was able to choose from a 'list' of modules - but only the one it had detected apparently ("Linux floppy") (which is funny because the machine has no floppy!).

Should I be emailing this to debian-boot as well? I think so... (conesquently there's a little summary above)

Thanks for the help so far, I'm not giving up ! (But I am about to install Knoppix in the meantime)

Cheers,
Rua HM.



--
Rua Haszard Morris
Software Engineer & Research Assistant
MARCS Auditory Laboratories
University of Western Sydney
http://marcs.uws.edu.au



Reply to: