[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Yahoo's Antispam proposal



on Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:39:35PM +0000, Brett Carrington (lists-brettcar@segvio.org) wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 05:25:24PM -0400, Bojan Baros wrote:

> > And about the idea that Bill Gates floated out there, about solving
> > a computer puzzle that would require 10 seconds or so of CPU time to
> > send the email...  Spammers already use distributed computing (some
> > computers are doing it willingly, others not quite so) to send out
> > spam.  This would not create a huge problem if you have plenty of
> > CPU cycles to spare.

Agreed.  They're stealing their SMTP servers.  They'll steal compute
servers as well.
 
> Gates' idea is being put to use every day on this very mailing list.
> Notice those GnuPG signatures lots of us seem to use? Try assigning
> higher "non-spam" scores to GnuPG signed messages.

Nope.

You'd have to score *trusted* sigs.

"Identity" qua identity is nothing.

Identity + trust isn't everything, but it's a good portion of the
journey.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   Moderator, Free Software Law Discussion mailing list:
     http://lists.alt.org/mailman/listinfo/fsl-discuss/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: