Re: Massive increase of spam on debian-*@l.d.o
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
cls@truffula.sj.ca.us writes:
> [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
> In article <1SrFy-6Lt-23@gated-at.bofh.it>, Adam Funk wrote:
>> On Wednesday 05 May 2004 09:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> William Ballard <40414.nospam@comcast.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> What steps are being taken to mitigate the significant increase in
>>>> spam getting through to the lists?
>>>
>>> I'm reporting the spam. What are you doing to help, or are you
>>> content to only bitch instead of take action?
>>
>> What reporting system do you use? (I use SpamCop.)
>
> That's too bad. Most well-run ISPs ignore Spamcop reports.
> Too many false positives.
Which is too bad, since usually it's the ISP's fault for not working
with Spamcop to resolve it.
- --
Paul Johnson
<baloo@ursine.ca>
Linux. You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAmS+gUzgNqloQMwcRAi0ZAJ9WakrIf2USGByR7pin/S4Gp6QjfwCgmK+w
i8TZ+HUOQG3jsnEjR6DPXrY=
=HG91
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: