[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ã??ã?£ã?«ã?¹æ??å?ºã?®ã??é?£çµ¡



Hello!

Wow, from you headers:
|Received: from imp4-q.free.fr (imp4-q.free.fr [212.27.42.4])
|        by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
|        id 280EFD4EB; Wed,  5 May 2004 10:29:21 +0200 (CEST)
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|Received: by imp4-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33)
|        id 2FA912C925; Tue,  4 May 2004 16:00:26 +0200 (MEST)
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you did your translation before I even started, and free.fr is to
blame for duplicated work... ;)

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 04:00:26PM +0200, sylvain.vedrenne@free.fr wrote:
> According to someone on my part (who speaks Japanese),
> this is a message from a server saying that a virus has been detected in a 
> message... So in a way it is spam, but the sender (the server) is not to blame.

Yes, the are to blame, see Karsten's answer or maybe
http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/open_letter_30jan2004.html

Cheers,
Flo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: