Re: sarge?
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
>
> David Fokkema (<dfokkema@ileos.nl>) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 09:33:30PM -0600, Jules Dubois wrote:
> >> In article <[🔎] 20040502025606.GA9609@nitpicking.com>, on Sat, 01 May
> >> 2004 22:56:06 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> >>
> >> > And it is IMPOSSIBLE to use Woody on a new server
> >> > now, because it doesn't support current hardware.
> >>
> >> What current hardware isn't supported by Woody?
> >
> > My 3Com 3c940 1Mbit ethernet card (sk98lin driver), but I suspect this
> > will be fixed by using kernel 2.4.24 from woody-proposed-updates. I
> > really think that most hardware problems are kernel related and will
> > be fixed in the next point release. Until then, put
> > woody-proposed-updates in your sources.
>
> If I remember correctly, this is not the first time that an updated
> kernel newer than 2.4.18 is in proposed-updates. So far they newer made
> it into the next revision, mostly for compatibility reasons (I think
> even the updated 2.4.18 packages were rejected last time). Is there
> any reason to believe that it will be different next time?
I didn't know this. I really hope 2.4.24 makes it into woody.
David
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: sarge?
- From: Kevin Mark <kmark+debian-user@pipeline.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: David Fokkema <dfokkema@ileos.nl>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Carl Fink <carl@fink.to>
- Re: sarge?
- From: "Derek Broughton" <dbroughton@lincsat.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Carl Fink <carlf@fink.to>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Jules Dubois <990rcb502@sneakemail.com>
- Re: sarge?
- From: David Fokkema <dfokkema@ileos.nl>
- Re: sarge?
- From: Andreas Janssen <andreas.janssen@bigfoot.com>