On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:42:27 -0600 Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> wrote: > At 2004-04-04T05:20:43Z, "Christopher L. Everett" > <ceverett@ceverett.com> writes: > > > substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense. > > Not really. Concurrent mirrored reads can be significantly faster than > striped reads, since each drive can be servicing a complete read request > simultaneously. RAID 0 functions the same way. Consecutive chunks of data alternate between the disks. -c -- Chris Metzler cmetzler@speakeasy.snip-me.net (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
Attachment:
pgpMJyBGG__Xn.pgp
Description: PGP signature