Re: Rejecting viruses the Right Way[tm]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:45:24PM -0500, Al Davis wrote:
> On Friday 13 February 2004 01:18 am, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Not so.
> Unfortunately, Karsten, you are wrong here.
Back up your statement, please.
> As a result, for improper action, anything goes for that address, so
> spammers and viruses can do what they want.
Not quite. The return-path only screws with broken virus scanners
that aren't rejecting at SMTP-time, but making up a bounce message
incorrectly assuming that the return-path is actually accurate.
.''`. Paul Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----