Re: whew

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:34:39 +0100, 
Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net> wrote in message 
<[🔎] 200402111834.39468.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>:

> On Wednesday 11 February 2004 18:07, David wrote:
> >  On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 03:51:37 -0500
> >
> >  "~Honorable Dr Lou Who" <irsmart2@gate.net> wrote:
> > > What a mess!
> >
> > [snip miles of babble]
> >
> > Uhhh...  this guy's _gotta_ be trolling, hasn't he?
> 
> Yup.
> 
> > No one could be this clueless......   could they????
> 
> Well, 1500 partner websites... Where have I seen that before...?

..MSN???  ;-)

> > However, this could be a prime example of the class of people who
> > definitely _should_ stick with windows..
> 
> And finance MS' robbery of our rights, including our right to receive 
> and impart information and ideas through any media and to participate 
> in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share 
> in scientific advancement and its benefits?
> 
> As much as one hate the trolls and the abusive newbies, the
> alternative, that they continue to pay MS money and allow them to
> retain the power to strip us of our rights, is so much worse that I
> feel it is not really an option. 

..aren't Darl McBride and Bill Gates other shills entitled to legal
defense?  And why not let this shill pay _back_ his salary?  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.