[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

dselect and glib troubles.



Hi!

I want to install the latest version of XMMS that requires glib >= 1.2.2
Using dselect, I found out that I have 2 versions of glib installed: 1.2.10.4 and 2.2.3-0jds. I suspect that the ./configure script of XMMS detects the older version instead of the newest one. But why does dselect keep both versions? How do I do to make the newest replace the oldest? dselect always tell me that there is a dependancy problem if I try to unisntall the oldest.
Moreover, I get also this dependancy problem:

*** Opt gnome    gnome-contro The GNOME Control Center for GNOME 2
*** Opt gnome    gnome-termin The GNOME 2 terminal emulator application
*** Opt libdevel libgtk2.0-de Development files for the GTK+ library
*** Opt libdevel libpango1.0- Development files for the Pango
*** Opt libs     libgtk2.0-0  The GTK+ graphical user interface library
*** Opt libs libpango1.0- Layout and rendering of internationalized text
*** Opt libs     libxft2      advanced font drawing library for X
*** Opt misc libgtk2.0-co Common files for the GTK+ graphical user interface library
*** Opt misc     libpango1.0- Modules and configuration files for the Pango
*** Opt x11 acme Enables the "multimedia buttons" found on laptops *** Opt devel libfontconfi generic font configuration library (development files)
*** Opt devel    libfreetype6 FreeType 2 font engine, development files
*** Opt devel xlibs-dev X Window System client library development files
*** Opt libs     libasound2   Advanced Linux Sound Architecture (libraries)
*** Opt libs     libaspell15  The GNU Aspell spell-checker runtime toolkits
*** Opt libs libfontconfi generic font configuration library (shared library)
*** Opt libs     libfreetype6 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files.
*** Opt utils    fontconfig   generic font configuration library

Can someone explain me what's going wrong? Because I don't see here any problem, but still it always appear.

Thanks for any help,

        Emmanuel



Reply to: