Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:30:41PM -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
> So, I ask: is this because mutt actually does *not* use In-reply-to or
> because some mutt users are (un)intentionally breaking threading?
No, it uses In-reply-to. Sounds like a personal problem.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAJE07UzgNqloQMwcRAnZjAKCRbtT5wshcHo2NFpkNRZ9Rx3K+5wCg2lWa
RrPPWz+wW6QRzQd4P6mJiio=
=FsJl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: