Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:23:53 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 4023E9C9.8050807@dmiyu.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040206183626.GG4285@barnyard.192.168.0.1>
References: <[🔎] 40228463.9030804@bumpycarrot.cjb.net> <[🔎] bvug1u$7ol$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 4022CF3E.3080006@dmiyu.org> <[🔎] 200402061242.39241.dpjames@rogers.com> <[🔎] 20040206183626.GG4285@barnyard.192.168.0.1>

Stephen wrote:

Well, I have TB 0.5a Jan 28 2004. The reply to sender works in newsgroup
mode.


    You'll note this is a mailing list, not a newsgroup.

--
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
       PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: Stephen <dallan@rogers.com>

References:
- Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: Joseph Jones <joe@bumpycarrot.cjb.net>
- Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: Paul Tietjens <paul.tietjens@moriarty.k12.nm.us>
- Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: David P James <dpjames@rogers.com>
- Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
  - From: Stephen <dallan@rogers.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
Next by Date: Re: Better program than Putty?
Previous by thread: Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
Next by thread: Re: Has anyone ever thought of getting the reply-to changed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread