[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ethernet routing



At Friday, 2 January 2004, Antony Gelberg <antony@antgel.co.uk> wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:46:06AM -0500, Debian User wrote:
>> in a previous post, i asked this question but not sure if an answer 
>> was found ...
>> 
>> 
>> i am trying to set up a network in my office at work. 
>> 
>> +---------------+     +---------------+
>> | 192.168.1.100 |-----| 192.168.1.1   |
>> | 255.255.255.0 |     | 255.255.255.0 |   +---------------+
>> +---------------+     | 10.20.1.158   |---| 10.20.4.48    |
>>                       | 255.255.0.0   |   | 255.255.0.0   |
>>                       +---------------+   +---------------+
>> 
>> the 192.168.1.100 machine can ping the 192.168.1.1 and 10.20.1.158 
>> interface but not the 10.20.4.48 interface. the 10.20.1.158 interface 

>> can ping the 10.20.4.48 interface.
>> 
>> my routing table is as follows:
>> 
>> dest         gateway    genmask       flags metric ref use iface
>> 192.186.1.0  *          255.255.255.0 u     0      0   0   eth1
>> 10.20.0.0    *          255.255.0.0   u     0      0   0   eth0
>> default      10.20.4.48 0.0.0.0       ug    0      0   0   eth0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> any suggestions as to what i am doing wrong?
>
>Not turning on IP routing?  cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward.  If it's
>0, routing is off.
>
>I suppose TDW for this is to set ip_forward=1 in /etc/network/options.
>What this does is effectively echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
>A

right ... forgot about that. when i ping 10.20.4.48 from 192.168.
1.100, the requests time out. this tells me that there is a route 
to the host ... if this matters. anyway, i am still unable to reach 
10.20.4.48 from 192.168.1.100.

anything else?











Reply to: