Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:29:12 -0600,
"Hoyt Bailey" <hoyt13@wiredok.com> wrote in message
<[🔎] 006701c3acfe$1582a520$1b5a22d0@blackgold>:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John" <bagdanof@comcast.net>
> To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 17:00
> Subject: Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium
>
>
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:12:48PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Folks, could you please take this off-topic thread somewhere else,
> > > perhaps to private e-mail? Let's get back to Debian.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Sigh......
> >
> > Good try Colin. Not a good way to present Debian/Linux for people
> > subscribing to this list. & the arrogant answer to filter out this
> > crap
> to
> > a newbie is nonsense.
> >
> > John
> >
> He happens to be right find another forum.
..bull, the way to avoid the flame wars is use the newsgroup interface
and a newsreader, and simply weed out those useless threads you
don't wanna download. Myself, I have little interest and knowledge
of isdn as I use a wifi link instead. And yeah, Gnus still on todo
list.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: