Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
File a bug report.
Why? I don't see it as a bug.
Mutt handles this situation correctly, as follows :
list-reply replies only to the list (because Mail-Followup-To
doesn't request a Cc)
reply asks if the Reply-To: address should be used
yes -> uses Reply-To: address
no -> uses From: address
group-reply asks if the Reply-To: address should be used (same
semantics as 'reply') and includes the list
address in the Cc: header
If sylpheed can't handle that, then that is a bug and ought to be fixed.
What's to say that the mutt was is The One True Way. Hey, don't get me wrong, I like mutt for the most part but a lot of how it does things is just plain stupid. Unless there is an RFC floating around out there that says that the list headers trump reply-to (there may be, I've not read the list headers RFC yet) then either way can be explained to be correct within reasonable expectations.
SC's way is "correct" because it would be analogous to setting "followup-to" in a newsgroup. IE, how can you encourate a person to take a discussion off list?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgp9NUq0tStSc.pgp
Description: PGP signature