On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:49:07PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
| On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 at 22:23 GMT, Tom penned:
| > * [27/10/2003 22:54] Monique Y. Herman <spam@bounceswoosh.org>:
| >
| >> > Has anyone else experienced something like this?
| >>
| >> How are you calling procmail? If it's from a .forward, can we see
| >> that, too?
| >
| > Well, initially, I thought it was from a .forward. Afterwards, I
| > learned that today's Debian/Exim configuration doesn't need a .forward
| > to call procmail. As soon as a .procmailrc file exists in the user's
| > home directory, mail will be handed over.
|
| Where did you find this information? I'd like to read it myself.
/etc/exim.conf
(presumably you/he are using the old exim v3.x package)
| I didn't realize that editing a .procmailrc without having procmail
| set up through a .forward could get me into trouble ...
exim can be set up to handle procmail delivery directly, without the
indirection of a .forward file.
-D
--
If you want to know what God thinks about money,
just look at the people He gives it to.
-- Old Irish Saying
http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/
Attachment:
pgp8ziZZ5Lcww.pgp
Description: PGP signature