[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Searching for an editor...



On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:24:11 -0400
Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net> wrote:

> Micha Feigin <michafeigin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 04:22, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > Not to start a flame war, but I don't think XEmacs is more
> > > graphical than Emacs21 (Emacs20, yes, but not Emacs21).
> > 
> > I don't think I have used emacs21 but I don't remeber, so I can't
> > tell. I also don't know how their gui comapare.
> > Do you know the differences (main ones)?

As far as I can tell, the most visible difference is that Xemacs seems
to do a better job with handling fonts. To be more specific, Xemacs has
more beautiful fonts and lets you change default font size. But Emacs is
also good, and of course has the advantage of working on the command
line as well as in X. There's no reason why you can't install both,
since the commands are almost identical.

regards,
Robert



Reply to: