[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What would happen to Challenge/Response if ...



on Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:24:17PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman (spam@bounceswoosh.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 at 03:48 GMT, Karsten M. Self penned:

> It was during that whole discussion in which you were actively involved.
> (Please let's not rehash that here.)

See d-u.

> Found it!
> 
> http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-users/2003-09/msg00225.html
> 
> [quote author="Jason R. Mastaler"]
> Currently TMDA does use C/R by default, and you have to configure it
> to deliver by default instead.  This is a throwback to the early days
> when TMDA did little more than C/R.  I'd not be oppose to reversing
> this though.  The idea would be that a new TMDA install would deliver
> all uncaught mail, and you'd have to set ACTION_INCOMING = 'confirm'
> in /etc/tmdarc or ~/.tmda/config to make C/R the last resort action.
> Regardless of this thread, I think this would make a new installation
> less painful as well.  Any opinions on this idea?
> [/quote]

Thanks.

Progress.  Not complete, however.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   Hollings:  bought, paid for, but couldn't deliver the CBDTPA:
     http://www.politechbot.com/docs/cbdtpa/hollings.s2048.032102.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: