Re: A newbie's confusion about GPL
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:29:33 -0700,
Tom <email@example.com> wrote in message
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 05:01:07AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:08:33 -0700,
> > Tom <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> > <20031020010833.GA13628@comcast.net>:
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:59:08PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > I was aware of all your facts and reasonings before you spoke.
> > > We just part ways on our interpretation of the facts.
> > >
> > > I'll repeat: anyplace people want to kill us, we want to kill
> > > them.
> > ..I believe I covered this ;-) in my post
> > <email@example.com>. ;-)
> > > Yes, Bin Laden is more important than Sadam.
> > ..why? ;-) On asking "those who will not kill" to "step aside" in
> > a recent tape, Osama bin Laden _actually_ honors the status of
> > civilians as required by the 4 Geneva Conventions. ;-)
> > How about Saddam and Sissy Boy George? ;-)
> Please don't practice moral equivalency.
..if we dont deal with our own war criminals, why should they?
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.