At Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:24:37 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Tom <tom@abwaerts.be> wrote: [...] > > I understand the point about Emacs being as "graphical" as > > anything else in a certain way, but I can't believe *you* > > don't understand what I meant with "graphical". :-) > > I guess I don't. Emacs _is_ graphical. And it has addons to > do just about anything. > > And CVS Emacs even uses GTK2... When will you package it? ;-)