Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:22:20 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030806042220.GB7252@ursine.ca>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1060095590.17718.69.camel@flmrroach>
References: <[🔎] 20030804201818.GA1176@earthlink.net> <[🔎] 1060095590.17718.69.camel@flmrroach>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:59:52AM -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
> Please point me to the rfc for netiquette. There is no "one true
> netiquette"

You mean RFC 1855, right?

- -- 
 .''`.     Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :'  :    proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/MIJ8J5vLSqVpK2kRAnp9AJ0RtfPPGmPqxrgbU0w9GAnooaAlewCglPgO
rU8Ya714zCMqxv1lZAIACvg=
=dp62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: Alan Connor <alanc@localhost>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: Mark Roach <mrroach@okmaybe.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NNTP to email?
Next by Date: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread