On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:09:51PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 03:47, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 01:18, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > --snip-- --snip-- --snip-- --and snip some more--
> >
> > Please tell me that you didn't, in fact, just type that all out by hand?
> > That's got to be quite hard on the fingers and terribly un-amusing to
> > boot. Why, one might go so far as to postulate that it would be even
> > worse than dealing with a dead parrot. But enough of this. I have things
> > I must attend to in my own, particular.....
> >
> > Idiom, sir?
> >
> > Idiom!
> >
> > <cue the coconut halves>
> >
> > p.s. And don't worry about how we got the coconuts either! :)
>
> Nobody expects the "Spanish Inquisition"... and in fact, 'ow do 'ou know
> 'es a King?
>
> Yes, I did. Just now. I did.
>
> I was pining for the fjord...
What kind of talk is this? I've got a licence for my pet mutt Eric,
and I've got a licence for my pet cat Eric. Can't be caught out now!
- You don't need a licence for your bleedin' cat!
I bleedin' well do, and I've got one! Look, wassat then?
- That is an MS-DOS licence with 'type' crossed out and 'cat' written
on in crayon.
Man didn't have the right <form>.
- What man?
The man from the spam detector van...
My theory is that all spam has spoofed headers at one end, much, MUCH
more rubbish in the middle, and a clicky link thing at the other.
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
* NNNN NNNN IIIIII !! *
* NNNN NN II !!!! *
* NN NN NN II !!!! *
o * NN NN NN II !! *
OOO * NN NN NN II !! *
OO I OO * NN NN NN II *
OO I OO * NNNN NNNNN IIIIII !! *
OO I OO * *
OOOOOO I OOOOOO * * * * * * * * * * * *
O OIO O * *
O * OIO * O * *
O OIO O * *
OO O OO * *
O _____ O * *
OO OO * * *
O OOOOOOO O
.oO ##### Oo.
Attachment:
pgpIfWhWaTNkp.pgp
Description: PGP signature