Re: next debian stable ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:43:40PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Well skipping i386 support doesn't necessarily mean that Linux 2.2. will
> be skipped. If Linux 2.6. is considered stable and get's included in
> sarge it would be resoanble to discuss Linux 2.2. again but that's not
> a topic ATM I think.
Looking at what's being said about it, it appears supporting i386 may
be infeasable since libstdc++5 requires an i80486 or better processor now.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+sgdYJ5vLSqVpK2kRAusZAKC7XlXnvjRtJ6oGsHio1XjjYczzHwCgwfXT
tbLfsEETcHGv7BToZnC/kPU=
=9zy6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: