Re: next debian stable ?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: next debian stable ?
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 03:34:34 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030501103434.GA3164@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20030430141420.5b967373.ronin2@bellatlantic.net>
- References: <20030429125444.2F9581800D8@smtp-2.hotpop.com> <20030429140711.GD479@gandalf> <3EAEC38C.1010804@davidkrider.com> <1051652329.872.52.camel@flmrroach> <3EAF108E.6000108@davidkrider.com> <20030430103058.GR2892@ursine.dyndns.org> <20030430151113.GB12041@nitpicking.com> <20030430141420.5b967373.ronin2@bellatlantic.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:14:20PM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> I hope Sarge includes an option to install with 2.2 kernels, for those with
> older, slower, memory-poor hardware.
That might not be the case. There's been rumors the last few days
that Debian may pull i386 in favor of i486 thanks to GCC, Debian
Weekly News isn't denying it, either. Hope nobody was looking on
putting sarge on an i80386.
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2003/17/
So what if Sarge doesn't have a 2.2 install option? Isn't that why we
have this? Up until woody came out, the website still had
installation images for bo...
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+sPg6J5vLSqVpK2kRAtUNAKC7QLUz/jAqPqzv1uOiCvfOsMk/HgCfbktx
R5afpxxPaN9/4iTKIXpIAiw=
=U2Yi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: