Re: Why does rsh still work?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Why does rsh still work?
From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:56:37 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030402055637.GA7803@misery.proulx.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org, Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030401230912.GB29465@unblinking-eye.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <[🔎] E190UXg-0004p4-00@mclean.mail.mindspring.net> <[🔎] 20030401230912.GB29465@unblinking-eye.lcs.mit.edu>

Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> ls -l `which rsh` /etc/alternatives/rsh
> should answer your question.

That shows the details.  But this seems more in the spirit of things.

  update-alternatives --display rsh

Bob

Attachment: pgpOsJ5ho0XyQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does rsh still work?
  - From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>

References:
- Why does rsh still work?
  - From: Mike M <linux-support@earthlink.net>
- Re: Why does rsh still work?
  - From: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: gnome 2.2 post-install: icon theme doesn't load, theme-manager segfaults
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Designing a Website
Previous by thread: Re: Why does rsh still work?
Next by thread: Re: Why does rsh still work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread