[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: shuttle disaster



On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 02:54, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 12:39:24AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > And at that, Canadian Forces are basically the British Forces but
> > > flying the Red Ensign instead.  I took history from a US perspective,
> > > and I still see that the British more than held thier own.  America
> > 
> > If the US hadn't chipped in with more ships and long range bombers,
> > all the valiant work of the RN & RCN would hae come up short.
> 
> I'm not entirely convinced of this, to be honest with you.  If we were
> talking the RA and RCA in northern Europe, you're right.  But even
> then, the RCA and RA was leading us into battle (not that this is a
> bad thing, the RA is more local and probaly had a slightly better idea
> of the local geography than the American and RCA soldiers did).

By RA, you mean RAF?

> > All during the CW, the French steered a much more independant military
> > course, having their own, non-integrated nuclear policy, and not
> > being fully integrated into NATO.
> 
> Hence bombing whales with nukes in the mid-Atlantic clear into the 1990s.

WTF??

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.     Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net           |
| Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ ron.l.johnson |
|                                                            |
| "For me and windows it became a matter of easy to start    |
|  with, and becoming increasingly difficult to be produc-   |
|  tive as time went on, and if something went wrong very    |
|  difficult to fix, compared to linux's large over head     |
|  setting up and learning the system with ease of use and   |
|  the increase in productivity becoming larger the longer I |
|  use the system."                                          | 
|   Rohan Nicholls , The Netherlands                         |
+------------------------------------------------------------+



Reply to: