[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: No ip-masquerade after upgrade 2.2.19 to 2.4.20



Please disregard my previous email.  On my fifth kernel compile, I now
have ipmasquerading.  I enabled and included everything under the sun
with regard to ppp, iptables, ipchains, and ipmasquerading.  Undoubtedly,
I have a bloated kernel with features I don't need, but it works now.

I now need to educate myself on the differences between 2.4 and 2.2 with
respect to iptables/ipchains.  Is there a concise synopsis anywhere in
the Linux Documentation Project that I can reference?

Thanks to all who have replied.
Happy Holidays!

Regards,
   Russ

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Russ Cook wrote:

> Thanks for the reply.  I'm still in a quandary.  I have installed
> .deb packages for iptables and ipmasq.  I believe I have enabled
> the appropriate kernel options (there seem to be many more options
> in the 2.4 series kernel).  I regret to say that I am ignorant of
> the intricacies of the iptables package, and don't have documentation
> to read.  Is anyone willing to summarize the minimum kernel options
> I must enable to provide ipmasq over a ppp dial-up connection?  I'm
> stuck and still using my old 2.2 kernel.
>
> Thanks much,
>    Russ
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 09:21:03AM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> > > I recently took the plunge and upgraded the kernel on that machine
> > > from 2.2.19 to 2.4.20.  Now, it no longer provides internet access
> > > for the lan.  From the gateway's console, I can access the internet,
> > > so ppp is working.  The machine is accessible from the other computers,
> > > so the eth0 funtions are working.  Can anyone help me troubleshoot this
> > > problem?
> >
> > Do you have iptables installed?  If you're using the ipmasq package,
> > all you need to do is install iptables.
> >
> > --
> >  .''`.     Baloo <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
> > : :'  :    proud Debian admin and user
> > `. `'`
> >   `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
> >
>
>



Reply to: