Re: Whose bug(s)? tetex-base, tetex-extra, lilypond
I had a similar problem. I think some files moved from one to the other
package, and apt wants to replace the old files from files out of the
"wrong" package. It should work if you remove lilypond, then apt-get
upgrade and then reinstall lilypond after all the TeX stuff is done.
However, this is most likely not a bug, it's just two packages a bit out
of sync and needing more communication between the maintainers.
David L. Craig schrieb:
I was upgrading sid from the techworld.rfa.org mirror
as of yesterday evening and ran into the following:
Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config', which is also in package lilypond
Preparing to replace tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using .../tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-extra ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map', which is also in package tetex-base
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Preparing to replace libpam-modules 0.76-8 (using .../libpam-modules_0.76-9_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libpam-modules ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)