Re: Whose bug(s)? tetex-base, tetex-extra, lilypond

[Jörg Johannes <liste_joerg@gmx.de>]

I had a similar problem. I think some files moved from one to the other 
package, and apt wants to replace the old files from files out of the 
"wrong" package. It should work if you remove lilypond, then apt-get 
upgrade and then reinstall lilypond after all the TeX stuff is done.
However, this is most likely not a bug, it's just two packages a bit out 
of sync and needing more communication between the maintainers.

hth
joerg

David L. Craig schrieb:
> I was upgrading sid from the techworld.rfa.org mirror
> as of yesterday evening and ran into the following:
>
> Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config', which is also in package lilypond
> Preparing to replace tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202-3 (using .../tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tetex-extra ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/etc/texmf/dvips/bsr-interpolated.map', which is also in package tetex-base
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Preparing to replace libpam-modules 0.76-8 (using .../libpam-modules_0.76-9_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libpam-modules ...
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)