Thus spake CaT (cat@zip.com.au):
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:28:09AM -0500, Geordie Birch wrote:
> > > Fuck You.
> >
> > It's definitely a Fuck You but how is it a spam?
>
> Well for one it's unsolicited (I know I didn't ask for it) and for
> another, it seems to me that the individual is at least partially
> illiterate and as such lacks the ability to express himself properly.
> This, in turn leads me to believe that this is an email that is either
> offering or requesting a fuck (ie sex). Now, it's obvious that said
> individual hasn't gotten laid in a while and as such is desperate. This
> would lead me to conclude that they are willing to trade some resource
> (money for example) for said sexual favours. As such the individuals
> email is commercial in nature.
>
> Therefore, since it's both unsolicited and commercial in nature, it can
> only be spam.
>
But atleast it's not the Nigerian spam so he gets 2 points for
originality. Obviously not IQ points though.
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
FYI:
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
Attachment:
pgpPK_uKe8XWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature