Thus spake CaT (cat@zip.com.au): > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:28:09AM -0500, Geordie Birch wrote: > > > Fuck You. > > > > It's definitely a Fuck You but how is it a spam? > > Well for one it's unsolicited (I know I didn't ask for it) and for > another, it seems to me that the individual is at least partially > illiterate and as such lacks the ability to express himself properly. > This, in turn leads me to believe that this is an email that is either > offering or requesting a fuck (ie sex). Now, it's obvious that said > individual hasn't gotten laid in a while and as such is desperate. This > would lead me to conclude that they are willing to trade some resource > (money for example) for said sexual favours. As such the individuals > email is commercial in nature. > > Therefore, since it's both unsolicited and commercial in nature, it can > only be spam. > But atleast it's not the Nigerian spam so he gets 2 points for originality. Obviously not IQ points though. :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
Attachment:
pgpPK_uKe8XWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature