Re: RE:Re: [Very OT] What [OT] stands for?

To: debuser <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RE:Re: [Very OT] What [OT] stands for?
From: Alex Malinovich <demonbane@the-love-shack.net>
Date: 09 Dec 2002 15:10:14 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 1039468214.24100.32.camel@Thief>
In-reply-to: <0fe4415572009c2DTVMAIL7@smtp.cwctv.net>
References: <0fe4415572009c2DTVMAIL7@smtp.cwctv.net>

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 15:00, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> whats IMHO then?
> 

IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;)

-Alex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: [Very OT] What [OT] stands for?
Next by Date: Re: Fetchmail doesn't fetch
Previous by thread: Re: Newbee Dual Linux Install and Lilo question...
Next by thread: "What satisfies this dependancy?"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread