Re: Proposal - non-free software removal
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Not to promote the spread of FUD, but interestingly it has come up
> recently on debian-legal that the MIT/X11 license could possibly be
> interpreted as non-free:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00164.html
No, the referenced thread merely asks the question of what exactly it
means to "deal in" a piece of software (as the phrase is used in the X11
license). That license clearly states that "deal in" includes, but is
not limited to, distributing (including selling) and modifying.
Craig
Reply to: