Re: Mutt or KMail

To: "Tom Cook" <tom.cook@adelaide.edu.au>, <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Mutt or KMail
From: "Antonio Rodriguez" <arodriguez31@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 07:51:19 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 004a01c24c2d$ba758b20$673d1a18@cfl.rr.com>
Reply-to: "Antonio Rodriguez" <arodriguez31@cfl.rr.com>
References: <[🔎] 200208231944.g7NJiZJt018457@bn0.blue.net> <[🔎] 20020825030124.GA3315@pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au>

According to what you say, what would then be the installation order to have
all in place?
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Cook" <tom.cook@adelaide.edu.au>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: Mutt or KMail

Reply to:

References:
- Mutt or KMail
  - From: David <dbree@duo-county.com>
- Re: Mutt or KMail
  - From: Tom Cook <tom.cook@adelaide.edu.au>

Prev by Date: special character (like ü, etc) with windows key?
Next by Date: strange behavour of mkisofs
Previous by thread: Re: Mutt or KMail
Next by thread: Re: Mutt or KMail
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread