On 0, David <dbree@duo-county.com> wrote: [snip] > So, would it be worthwhile for me to convert? One of the incentives is the > fact that Mutt is "modern" in the way it deals with inline attachements, > etc.. and it appears that KMail isn't.. Also, if I do switch, would it be > best to let Exim do all the mail downloads as well as uploads, or would it > be just as well to let Mutt fetch the mail and simply let Exim send it? > Are there any advantages or disadvanteges in doing it either way? The advantage I gain in using fetchmail to download mail is that then I can easily pipe it through procmail... in fact the default exim config does so automagically if you have procmail installed and have a .procmailrc file in your home directory. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup. Get my GPG public key: https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au
Attachment:
pgp72nZZ8i_1b.pgp
Description: PGP signature