On 0, Frank Brodbeck <oakenshield@gmx.net> wrote: > > [Assuming it's a proxy and not just a packet filter] > > > > Perhaps you'd want to study httptunnel then. If you can get it to work > > with your proxy and can live the decreased bandwith that is (TCP/IP over > > HTTP via (multiple) caching/delaying proxies over TCP/IP isn't exactly > > going to be fast). > > > AFAIR a tunnel should be possible with packet filtering too. > And correct me if I am wrong but isn't it easier to tunnel a packet > filter than a proxy? Yes, but what's the point? If you've only got package filtering to content with then you might as well just start your sshd on port 443 and be done with it - it will be faster and work just as well. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide Classifications of inanimate objects: Those that don't work, those that break down, and those that get lost. Get my GPG public key: https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au
Attachment:
pgpR1SRvw2Hfk.pgp
Description: PGP signature