On 0, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls <ke6sls@cox.net> wrote: [snip] > My question is simple: Would the majority of users here still avoid IBM > drives, or was this a foul quirk of a single bad line of drives from IBM? > My next question would be: What has/is IBM doing about this bad PR? Oh, come on, man, IBM are the kings of bad PR. Compared to some IBM exploits this is *good* PR. It was a while ago, but I saw the manual from an early release of OS/2 Warp, without pages 2, 4, 6, 8... yep, every even page was missing. I have often been convinced that IBM have a death wish, but they hang in there. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide "Intellectual freedom is not the freedom to believe anything, but the freedom to believe only the truth." - Dr. John Stott Get my GPG public key: https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au
Attachment:
pgp6mUTcl5F1v.pgp
Description: PGP signature